Two bugs found + video timing
pullmoll at t-online.de
Thu Jun 7 04:43:07 PDT 2007
I have to correct myself. This was wrong:
> The next address modification obviously needs to mask the bits it wants to
> change, i.e. it is driving the lines low, too. I say obviosuly because
> tasks were executing invalid f2 functions with an OR alone. Specificially
> the DHT was going nuts prior to this change. I have yet to carefully check
> the corresponding section of the schematics to be 100% sure.
The erroneous behaviour of the DHT was due to an involuntary "task
crossing" caused by some other bug.
Sorry and I'll try to take care to avoid non-bug bug reports in the future.
More information about the Altogether-devel