[HPCC-Conf] Conference Report
Tony Duell
hpcc-conf@lists.handheld.org
Thu Oct 3 15:33:02 2002
> 1. It has been our policy to freely and openly discuss information that =
> falls into our hands by means other than HP controlled channels.
Agreed. And I feel strongly that this should continue, and therefore that
we (conference organisers, club committee members, etc) should not accept
information (presentations, etc) that can't be discussed as we see fit
>
> 2. I see nothing at all sensitive in Fred's presentation. It is a =
> straightforward marketing approach, not a technology push as in the =
Alas, that's true :-(
> past. And it will fail if HP tries to imitate TI, Casio, Gold Star, or =
> Shu-Ping Electric.
Agreed. I wish I'd though of this at the time, but I realised too late
that the perfect counterexample to HP's ideas was in front of the person
sitting next to me. A Hasselblad camera. Hasselblad do not make
mass-market cameras. They make very good cameras and price them accordingly.
So what I wished I said was 'OK, please lets have real HP again. Lets
have gold plated PCBs, dual-shot-moulded keys, proper keycontacts, real
manuals, facilities for hacking, peripherals, and all those other things
that mean the HP41 is still loved 20 years later. Price the new machine
at $5000 if you have to, because somehow we'll buy them. We're not going
to buy mass-market calculators, though'
>
> 3. Where do you get the idea that WE are THEIR community? They left us =
> five years ago for greener pastures. This resulted in stripping =
> capability out of their machines, rather than adding it.
I agree. HP are unlike to ever do anything for us again (20 years ago, or
so, they did release useful internal information to user groups, not any
more). So we should not do anything special for them.
As I said to the rest of the HPCC committee a couple of months before the
conference 'If this club is no longer totally independant of HP, then I
will certainly not rejoin'. I have little desire to pay to be a member of
a club which is a thinly disguised HP marketing department. I don't want
HP to tell us what we can or can not discuss (apart, I guess, from
information that they have directly provided to us, but as I said
earlier, we really should refuse such information).
-tony